Sanicki Lawyers Melbourne

  • Home
  • Services
    • Commercial Lawyers Melbourne
    • Music & Entertainment
    • Film & Television
    • Conveyancing Lawyers
    • Trade Marks & Intellectual Property
    • Defamation Lawyers
    • Copyright & Licensing
    • Debt Collection & Insolvency
    • Family Lawyer Melbourne
    • Wills & Estates
    • Franchising Lawyer Melbourne
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • New Technology & Start Ups
    • Fashion & Design
    • Trade Promotions
  • Clients
    • Music & Entertainment
    • Commercial
  • About
  • Careers
    • Work With Us
    • Intern With Us
  • Contact us
+61 3 9510 9888
No Gold Medals for Olympic Sponsors
July 25, 2016
  |  
Maddalena Rinaldi

With the 2016 Rio Olympic Games set to begin next month, intellectual property protection with brands not officially affiliated with the Olympics and their sponsorship agreements with athletes have been thrust into the spotlight.

 

The IOC previously had a rule (rule 40 of the Olympic Charter) that non-official Olympic sponsors could not advertise using athletes that they have sponsorship deals with during the Games. This also extended for approximately two weeks before and after the event. This rule was altered slightly last year to allow such brands to include these athletes in their advertising as long as none of the Olympics’ extensive IP was included, such as images of the five Olympic rings or explicit mention of the Rio Games.

 

Recently, the United States Olympic Committee has issued warnings to a myriad of these brands, such as sportswear brand Oiselle, stating that “Commercial entities may not post about the Trials or Games on their corporate social media accounts. This restriction includes the use of USOC’s trademarks in hashtags such as #Rio2016 or #TeamUSA.”

 

It has been legal in the US to trademark hashtags since 2013, although there is some controversy over whether the USOC is correct in stating that the law can be applied in this way to the Olympic Games’ IP. Non-official Olympic sponsors, partners or any other third parties are generally restricted in their use of any Olympic Games IP only for uses related to: journalistic purposes, communicating opinions with no commercial purpose, or for educational or general debate and discussion purposes.

 

Given the highly significant amount of media attention attracted by the Olympic Games, it’s tempting for brands to try to capitalize on such a significant opportunity. However, brands without official Olympics Games affiliation clearly need to be careful about any use or mention of IP associated with the Olympics.

Article written by Emma Cameron

 

Back to news
 
  • Melbourne
    Level 2, 240 Chapel Street
    Prahran, VIC 3181
    Phone +61 3 9510 9888
  • Brisbane
    139 Gotha Street
    Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006
    Phone +61 7 3333 1844
  • General Enquiries
    hello@sanickilawyers.com.au
    Fax +61 3 9510 9888
Sanicki Lawyers Melbourne

Services

  • Commercial Lawyers Melbourne
  • Wills & Estates
  • Music & Entertainment
  • Franchising Lawyer Melbourne
  • Conveyancing Lawyers
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Trade Promotions
  • New Technology & Start Ups
  • Defamation Lawyers
  • Fashion & Design
  • Copyright and Licensing
  • Trade Marks & Intellectual Property
  • Film & Television
  • Debt Collection & Insolvency
  • Family Lawyer Melbourne

Info

  • About Us
  • Clients
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Blog

Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin

© Copyright 2020. Website & SEO Melbourne & Digital Marketing Melbourne by ZIB Digital | All Rights Reserved.