Sanicki Lawyers Melbourne

  • Home
  • Services
    • Commercial Lawyers Melbourne
    • Music & Entertainment
    • Film & Television
    • Conveyancing Lawyers
    • Trade Marks & Intellectual Property
    • Defamation Lawyers
    • Copyright & Licensing
    • Debt Collection & Insolvency
    • Wills & Estates
    • Franchising Lawyer Melbourne
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • New Technology & Start Ups
    • Fashion & Design
    • Trade Promotions
    • Medical & Allied Health
    • Renewable Energy
  • Clients
    • Music & Entertainment
    • Commercial
  • About
  • Careers
    • Work With Us
    • Intern With Us
  • Contact us
+61 3 9510 9888
Clive Palmer to bear Mark McGowan’s Cross-Claim costs in their defamation proceeding
August 12, 2022
  |  
Sanicki Lawyers

Federal Court Justice Michael Lee has ordered Clive Palmer to pay part of the costs from his defamation proceeding with Mark McGowan.

Clive Palmer initiated defamation proceedings against Mark McGowan following defamatory statements made at a press conference in 2020. Mr McGowan’s comments included labelling Mr Palmer an “enemy of the state” after he and his firm Mineralogy, contested Western Australia’s hard border. Mr Palmer was then counter-sued by Mr McGowan over defamatory comments concerning “legislation which prevented [Mr Palmer] from claiming up to $30 billion in damages over a mining development by his firm.”

On 8 August 2022, the Federal Court found that both parties had defamed each other. The Court ordered $5,000 to be paid to Mr Palmer and $20,000 to be paid to Mr McGowan.

In the costs hearing three days later, Justice Lee reiterated to Mr Palmer and Mr McGowan that litigating this matter was a suboptimal use of Court resources. Justice Lee labelled Mr Palmer’s initiation of legal action as unreasonable. His Honour identified Mr McGowan to have been “dragged into Court” and was satisfied that but for Mr Palmer suing Mr McGowan, Mr McGowan would not have commenced legal action.

When assessing the costs to be awarded, Lee J considered the “evidentiary matter of significance”. In his view, the offer of compromise or Calderbank offer made by Mr McGowan demonstrated a significant attempt to reconcile. His Honour added that “both men went too far in their political jousting, and both men litigated, but only one was willing to draw back and avoid a long and costly hearing.”

Lee J noted that the offer, if accepted, would have meant both parties would walk away from the proceedings, with no orders as to costs.

The Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 25.14 provides that if an offer made by someone making a claim, is unreasonably not accepted, and a judgment is obtained more favourable than the terms of the offer, indemnity costs follow. Additionally, if an offer made by someone defending a claim is unreasonably not accepted, and a judgment was obtained in terms better than the offer, indemnity costs follow.

Lee J queried whether rejecting the offer would be classified as “unreasonable” as, among other reasons, the offer did not recognise that Mr Palmer had been defamed. However, Mr Palmer continuing down a litigious path, without making a counter-offer, was said to lack reasonableness.

In considering what was a just cost order in all the circumstances, Lee J ordered Mr Palmer to pay Mr McGowan’s costs of the Cross-Claim only. The costs were not awarded on an indemnity basis. His Honour made this order (not ordering costs generally) as Mr McGowan defamed Mr Palmer, hence the full costs of the Primary Proceeding were not warranted.

To read the full judgment of Palmer v McGowan (No 6) [2022] FCA 927, click here.

If you would like legal advice or representation in relation to a defamation claim, contact Jonathan Xian (jonathan@sanickilawyers.com.au) or Darren Sanicki (darren@sanickilawyers.com.au) or call us on (03) 9510 9888.

Back to news
 
  • Melbourne
    9 Regent Street
    Prahran, VIC 3181
    Phone +61 3 9510 9888
  • Brisbane
    139 Gotha Street
    Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006
    Phone +61 7 3333 1844
  • General Enquiries
    hello@sanickilawyers.com.au
    Fax +61 3 9510 9888
Sanicki Lawyers Melbourne

Services

  • Commercial Lawyers Melbourne
  • Wills & Estates
  • Music & Entertainment
  • Franchising Lawyer Melbourne
  • Conveyancing Lawyers
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Trade Promotions
  • New Technology & Start Ups
  • Defamation Lawyers
  • Fashion & Design
  • Copyright and Licensing
  • Trade Marks & Intellectual Property
  • Film & Television
  • Debt Collection & Insolvency

Info

  • About Us
  • Clients
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Blog

Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin

© Copyright 2022. Website & SEO Melbourne & Digital Marketing Melbourne by ZIB Digital | All Rights Reserved.